• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Motor Fluctuations

Articles Collection

  • Movement Disorders
  • Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
MENU 
  • Home
  • Collection
    • Brief Reports
    • Case Reports
    • Editorial
    • Research Articles
    • Revealing Images
    • Reviews
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
  • This article collection was made possible by Cynapsus.
  • Cynapsus

Gastroretentive carbidopa/levodopa, DM-1992, for the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease

By Leo Verhagen Metman MD, PhD*, Natividad Stover MD, Cuiping Chen PhD, Verne E. Cowles PhD and Michael Sweeney MD

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

ABSTRACT
Objectives
This study was undertaken to compare efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of DM-1992, an extended-release formulation of carbidopa/levodopa (CD/L-dopa) with immediate-release (IR) CD/L-dopa in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease.

Methods
This randomized, open-label, crossover study included a 3-d baseline and two 10-d treatment periods. Patients with daily OFF time of 2.5 h or more taking 400 mg or more L-dopa/d in four or more divided doses were titrated to stable regimens of DM-1992 2 times per day or CD/L-dopa IR 3 times to 8 times per day. Patients were allowed to take rescue CD/L-dopa as needed. Using home diaries, patients recorded OFF time and ON time with or without troublesome dyskinesia during baseline and treatment days 7 through 9. During 12-h clinic visits on day 10, plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetics, and motor performance was assessed hourly.

Results
Thirty-four patients were enrolled; mean baseline L-dopa dosage was 968 mg/d. After titration, CD/L-dopa IR was dosed 4.8 times per day and DM-1992, 2 times per day. Rescue CD/L-dopa IR was given 1.3 times during the DM-1992 arm and 0.2 times during the CD/L-dopa IR arm. The reduction from baseline in % OFF time was greater for DM-1992 compared with CD/L-dopa IR (−5.52% vs. +1.33%; P = 0.0471). At steady-state, compared with CD/L-dopa IR, DM-1992 exhibited a smoother plasma L-dopa concentration profile mostly because of a significantly higher (day 10) predose L-dopa concentration, associated with enhanced motor performance. Although more patients taking DM-1992 had one or more adverse events (AEs) than CD/L-dopa IR patients (35% vs. 15%), no pattern to the AEs was seen, nor any resulting discontinuations.

Conclusions
DM-1992 was associated with a reduction in %OFF time compared with CD/L-dopa IR despite a reduced dosing frequency. Although the open-label study design and the greater number of rescue doses during the DM-1992 arm call for caution in interpreting the results, the elevated predose plasma L-dopa concentration (12 h after DM-1992 administration) lends objective support to our findings, suggesting that phase 3 studies are warranted. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Filed Under: Research Article Tagged With: carbidopa/levodopa, efficacy, gastroretention, Parkinson's disease, pharmacokinetics

Primary Sidebar

Movement DisordersMovement Disorders is the leading journal on Parkinson’s disease, neurodegenerative & neurodevelopmental disorders & abnormalities in motor control.

Edited By:
Jose A. Obeso, MD, PhD

Movement Disorders Clinical PracticeMovement Disorders Clinical Practice is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders.

Edited By:
Kailash Bhatia, MD, DM, FRCP
Marcelo Merello, MD, PhD

Official journals of the

International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Popular

  • Pharmacological insights into L-DOPA-induced motor fluctuations of patients with Parkinson disease

  • Clinical spectrum of levodopa-induced complications

  • New treatments for levodopa-induced motor complications

  • Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson’s disease: Final 12-month, open-label results

  • EuroInf: A Multicenter Comparative Observational Study of Apomorphine and Levodopa Infusion in Parkinson’s Disease

This article collection
was made possible by Cynapsus.
Cynapsus

Footer

  • Help & Support
  • About Us
  • Cookies & Privacy
  • Wiley Job Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertisers & Agents
Copyright © 1999-2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Wiley
The content on this site is intended for health professionals.